Electrosensitivity 



Coronavirus


Back to: Practical Advice


To: 5G Health Harm



Coronavirus and Radio Frequency Radiation


Immunity to Coronavirus Impaired by Radio Frequency Radiation

The coronavirus disease COVID19 was first identified in Wuhan, China, in December 2019. Since then it has spread across the world. The coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 which causes COVID19 does not seem to have been caused directly by 5G radiation.


Coronavirus may be made worse by pollution, including air particulates and radio frequency radiation, including 5G. For radio frequency radiation, this is because RFR weakens the immune system and can, in some people, be a factor in high blood pressure and respiratory conditions. RFR has been known to weaken the immune system since 1960.


The possible role of radio frequency radiation, especially the high intensity used in upgraded 4G+ and 5G with beam-forming, in reducing a population's immunity has been suggested at Wuhan in China, Lombardy in Italy, and Evergreen Health in Kirklands. Conversely, Germany, with its current relatively low mortality rate, has a comparatively limited coverage of 3G and 4G radiation, as do parts of Africa. Prof. Karl Friston, appying his free energy principle, considered that the reason for Germany's relative low mortality rate was the existence of immunological 'dark matter', but he did not relate this to active inference based on EM stress levels.

Any wireless radiation can weaken the immune system over the long term. Reducing environmental radiation, such as from cell towers, cell phones and WIfi, helps produce a stronger immune system.


The role of various biological pathways in COVID-19 which are also affected by EMFs and RFR has been highlighted, including:

Cytokines:

Interferons:

and Vitamin D:


See the next section below for the possible role of demyelination in COVID-19 effects.


Some viruses, including COVID-19, and conditions such as pneumonia and sepsis, involve calcium flux, which has been shown to be affected by EMFs and RFR since 1974 (see Mechanisms and Pathways):


Short-term (6 or 30 minutes average) heating-only limits, such as those of the IEEE, FCC and ICNIRP, do not protect against the known long-term and non-thermal effects, including damage to the immune system. Since most elderly people already have inflammatory conditions with impaired immune systems made worse by long-term wireless exposure, they are especially susceptible to the additional burden of infections such as coronavirus COVID-19.


Some suggestions that Radio Frequency Radiation, including 5G deployment, may be correlated with increased severity of COVID-19 symptoms have been published, but these studies do not usually include air particulates and positive/negative ions:

Coronavirus COVID-19 is associated with respiratory problems, pneumonia, heart problems, damage to kidneys, gasteroenterological problems and male infertility. COVID19 is much more serious for the elderly and those with additional conditions who need special protection. In addition, 'long COVID-19' post-viral effects can be devastating. 


Some of the articles and videos listed here do not present full scientific evidence for their claims.
Others, such as Hardell, Havas, Heroux, Klinghardt, Kostoff, Moskowitz and Pall, present much more scientific evidence.



Demyelination, PMP22, Neurological Symptoms, Hearing loss and Guillain-Barré Syndrome: 'Long' COVID

Some reports associate the symptoms of COVID-19 and trial COVID-19 vaccines with demyelination, PMP22 effects and related neurological effects. 

These neurological effects include neuropathological symptoms similar to Chronic Fatigue Syndrome or Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME), Electrosensitivity, Encephalitis, Guillain‐Barré syndrome (GBS), Hearing loss, Lyme Disease, Multiple Sclerosis (MS) and Transverse Myelitis. 


These neurological effects can result in 'long' COVID-19.  This includes prolonged fatigue, hearing loss and other neurological disturbances.



Origin of SARS-CoV-2: an Engineered Bioweapon? Claims for Compensation


The exact origin of the virus SARS-CoV-2 has not yet been established, although increasing evidence is pointing towards the Wuhan Level 4 laboratory. On February 17 2020 Chen Quanjiao, a researcher at Wuhan P4, allegedly claimed that Wan Yanyi, director general of the laboratory, was suspected of leaking the virus. By April 19 2020 29% of Americans thought it was genetically modified in a lab., and 43% zoonotic, according to Pew Research. The polybasic furin cleavagae site, PRRA, which is unique among such coronaviruses, gives SARS-CoV-2 a massive gain of function and was almost certainly inserted by teams such as the US and Chinese which have been making such insertions since 2006. 


It is similar to SARS-CoV-1 and also has features of a bat virus, perhaps transmitted via pangolin. Wuhan then had large wet animal markets, such as Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market which was closed on January 1 2020, but allegedly did not sell bats. In May 2020 Chinese authorities admitted that the virus did not originate in the market. On December 31 2019, the day the Chinese announced the discovery of the virus after it appeared in Thailand and Taiwan raised concerns, the Chinese authorities started censoring news of the virus from search engines, deleting terms including “SARS variation, “Wuhan Seafood market” and “Wuhan Unknown Pneumonia.” On January 1 2020 8 doctors in Wuhan who warned about new virus were detained and condemned.A Global Times tweet on January 2 2020 stated: “Police in Central China’s Wuhan arrested 8 people spreading rumours about local outbreak of unidentifiable #pneumonia. Previous online posts said it was SARS.” On January 24 2020, officials in Beijing prevented the Wuhan Institute of Virology from sharing sample isolates with the University of Texas.


Although there have been allegations of increased ill health possibly related to COVID-19 from August 2019, the first known case of COVID-19 may have been on December 1 2019. This was not related to the Wuhan seafood market. SARS-CoV-2 has not been found in the wild. Its nearest relative is bat virus, RaTG13, collected from bats by Wuhan researchers in 2013, in Yunnan Province, about 1,000 miles away from Wuhan. RaTG13 was allegedly stored in Wuhan. It was not recorded in the scientific literature or in gene banks until January 23 2020, when Shi Zhengli and others from Wuhan published that RaTG13 was 96.2% similar to SARS-CoV-2.


However the bats viruses do not contain the same spike protein found in SARS-CoV-2 which enables it to infect humans. The spike protein in SARS-CoV-2 is unique and different from other coronavirus spike proteins. A section of spike protein nearly identical to that in SARS-CoV-2 was found in one our of 25 Malayan Pangolins. But the one infected Malayan Pangolin was captured outside of China, far from Yunnan, the only source of RaTG13 apart from Wuhan, and this Pangolin virus is seems rare. "It is highly improbable that an extremely rare virus from an isolated area in Yunnan infected and mutated inside pangolins that were caught outside of China", according to Leu, making it "unlikely that this recombination of two viruses happened naturally in the wild. The theory that these two viruses combined naturally ... has zero evidence."


In fact SARS-CoV-2 may not be a new virus but the same as BtCoV/4991 which is already listed in the database and published literature in 2013. When the Wuhan lab resequenced the mineshaft sample following the COVID-19 outbreak, they simply renamed BtCoV/4991, which is 98.7% identical with SARS-CoV-2 for nucleotides and the 370 base pairs in the sections of sequencing recorded, but did not refer to the existing BtCoV/4991. Viruses in the mine had killed some miners.


On December 6 2019,  5 days after a man linked to Wuhan’s seafood market presented pneumonia-like symptoms, his wife contracted it, suggesting human to human transmission.


One feature, the furin cleavage of the spike protein, is more similar to Ebola and HIV than SARS. This addition increases 'gain of function' or the rapid transmission of the virus. However, of four inserts, two are found in bats and one is a small difference (6 AA). It could perhaps arise by natural mutation but this is unknown at present. In 2015 scientists warned of the dangers from engineered bat viruses, as already created at Wuhan P4, with pandemic potential. The polybasic furin cleavagae site, PRRA, is unique among such coronaviruses. It gives SARS-CoV-2 a massive gain of function or increased infectivity. The PRRA sequence is not present in the bat RaTG13 nor in pangolin coronaviruses. It was almost certainly inserted by teams such as the US and Chinese which have previously made such insertions. In 2006 a U.S. team inserted RRSRR into the spike protein of SARS-CoV and in 2009 another U.S. group inserted four such RRSRR into SARS-CoV. In October 2019 in Beijing a polybasic furin cleavage site was inserted in SARS-CoV in a chicken coronavirus. So advanced is genetic modification of viruses that another team took only a week to resurrect a virus from receipt of synthetic DNA fragments.


It has been noted that some U.S. scientists were anxious to deny the evidence that SARS-CoV-2, with its polybasic furin cleavage site giving it massive gain of function with regard to receptors like ACE2 and CD147, was engineered with this insertion which is not found zoonotically. The withdrawal was forced of a paper suggesting that this was an unusual insertion. Scientists allegedly denying the evidence included Kristian Andersen and Michael Osterholm, according to Chris Martenson. Other scientists, such as Shing Hei Zhan et al., 2020, consider that human engineering of this insertion is a possibility. One factor in such denials may be the U.S. Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989 which states: “Whoever knowingly develops, produces, stockpiles, transfers, acquires, retains, or possesses any biological agent, toxin, or delivery system for use as a weapon, or knowingly assists a foreign state or any organization to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for life or any term of years, or both."


It the virus leaked from the Wuhan level 4 laboratory before the case recorded on December 1 2019, then the reduced cellphone traffic at and near the laboratory in October 2019 may be relevant. It was reported that there was no device traffic within the facility October 7-24 and October 14 -19 there was no device activity in the area around the laboratory.


The virus was first identified, with a case reported on December 31 2019, in Wuhan, China, which has a level 4 facility for this type of virus and for bioweapons work. Another level 4 facility, in Pirbright, England, took out a patent on an animal and bird coronavirus, and was reportedly financially sponsored by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Another level 4 facility, also mentioned in some reports, is at Winnipeg in Canada, where reportedly some Chinese scientists once worked and from which a shipment of viruses was allegedly exported to China in March 2019, although the significance of these events was disputed. 


On October 18 2019, the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, in partnership with the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, hosted Event 201, a pandemic coronavirus exercise in New York, NY.  Following the Washington Times' article on January 24 2020, they stated that they modeled a fictional coronavirus pandemic and that "We are not now predicting that the nCoV-2019 outbreak will kill 65 million people". On the same day the Pirbright Institute stated that their coronavirus research was on animals and birds.


On February 18 2010 Bill Gates in a TED show at Long Beach, California, allegedly talked about a 10-15% population reduction (c.1 billion people) through global vaccination, health care, etc., while Bill Gates co-founded CEPI and the Gates Foundation with GAVI through Agenda ID2020 is allegedly developing an electronic chip to go with vaccinations.  


On January 24 2020 the Washington Times' article "Virus-hit Wuhan has two laboratories linked to Chinese bio-warfare program, possible link to coronavirus" allegedly stated: 

“The deadly animal virus epidemic spreading globally may have originated in a Wuhan laboratory linked to China’s covert biological weapons program, according to an Israeli biological warfare expert [Dany Shoham] … China in the past has denied having any offensive biological weapons. The State Department, in a report last year, said it suspects China has engaged in covert biological warfare work … He identified the secure Wuhan National Biosafety Laboratory at the institute as engaged in research on the Ebola, Nipah, and Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever viruses. The Wuhan virology institute is under the Chinese Academy of Sciences. But certain laboratories within it “have linkage with the PLA or BW-related elements within the Chinese defense establishment,” he said.”


It has been stated: "While SARS viruses have escaped from a Beijing lab on at least four occasions, no such event has been documented in Wuhan" (Kasprak, April 1 2020), but evidence emerging in April 2020 suggested that Huang Yanling, a graduate researcher working at Wuhan 4 Lab, may have been the first case of COVID19. It has been alleged that China admitted COVID-19 on December 31 2019 only after the first overseas case was detected in Thailand. The latter was confirmed as COVID-19 on January 13 2020 after China released the genetic sequence of COVID-19 on January 12 2020. Dr Li Wenliang, the original whistleblower in Wuhan, died from COVID-19 on February 6 2020. By then the Chinese Communist Party had arrested eight doctors for 'spreading rumor and destabilizing society'. A powerful speech of February 6 2020 by Anastasia Lin available on YouTube helped many realise how the CCP had tried to hide COVID-19 at first. On February 4 2020 it was reported that Frank Plummer, the Canadian scientist who was a key figure in research on the origin of COVID-19, had died mysteriously in Kenya.


Several media investigations at the start of April 2020 suggested that the evidence now suggests that SARS-CoV-2 began in Wuhan P4 Lab, where the first person infected was a graduate researcher. Zheng-Li Shi researched into synthetic viruses, and SARS-CoV-2 seems to have four spliced inserts which give it its greater transmission than SARS-CoV-1. Zheng-Li Shi was behind the paper in Nature of 2013 showing the first 'Isolation and Characterization of a Bat SARS-like Coronavirus That Uses the ACE2 Receptor', the key element of SARS-CoV-2. In 2015 her team published 'A SARS-like Cluster of Circulating Bat Coronaviruses Shows Potential for Human Emergence'. This showed for the first time how a SARS virus affecting lungs with no known cure could be spliced to make it to cross species.


The seafood market in Wuhan did not sell bats, so the mutation unlikely occurred there. The market may simply have been a transmission point or the selling place for diseased animals no longer required at the Wuhan Institute of Virology ten miles away. Cao Bin, a doctor at the Wuhan Jinyintan Hospital, highlighted research showing that 13 of the first 41 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 had not had any contact with the market. 


It has been alleged that Danielle Anderson and Peng Zhou collaborated on research into bat coronavirus at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. The U.S. provided funding of $7.4 million for this research in two phases, firstly on bat coronavirus and secondly on gain-of-function.


The first $3.7 million 5-year project ran from 2014 to 2019. It was to collect and study bat coronaviruses. The program funded Shi Zheng-Li, a virologist at the Wuhan lab, and other researchers to investigate and catalogue bat coronaviruses in the wild. The bats were collected from Yunnan, and the bats from Yunnan caves have been linked with the bat virus element in SARS-CoV-2. A ‘‘Sensitive but Unclassified’’ cable, dated January 19, 2018, obtained by The Washington Post, revealed that US embassy scientists and diplomats in Beijing visited the laboratory and sent warnings back to Washington about inadequate safety practices and management weaknesses as it conducted research on coronaviruses from bats. It stated: “During interactions with scientists at the WIV laboratory, they noted the new lab has a serious shortage of ­appropriately trained technicians and investigators needed to safely operate this high-containment laboratory.”


Under the second program, the U.S. provided a $3.7 million grant from the National Institutes of Health in 2019 ("Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence" - see Deigin), with the backing of the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases, led by Dr. Fauci. It was for six years until 2025 to fund research and scientists at the Wuhan Institute of Virology and other institutions for much-criticized work on gain-of-function research on bat coronaviruses. The project was run by EcoHealth Alliance, under Peter Daszak. NIH canceled the project on April 24 2020, according to Politico. The project proposal states: "We will use S protein sequence data, infectious clone technology, in vitro and in vivo infection experiments and analysis of receptor binding to test the hypothesis that % divergence thresholds in S protein sequences predict spillover potential."


On February 6 2020 South China University of Technology researchers published a study that concluded “the killer coronavirus probably originated from a laboratory in Wuhan. Safety level may need to be reinforced in high-risk biohazards laboratories”, although the author, Botao Xiano, soon withdrew it.


By late April 2020 it was becoming clear that
"SARS-CoV-2 appears to be a bioengineered bat coronavirus— which was initially benign and non-transmittable to humans. Zhengli then genetically modified the virus to integrate spike proteins that allows the virus to enter human cells by attaching to ACE-2 receptors. That was the first modification. The second modification was to integrate an envelope protein from HIV called GP141, which tends to impair the immune system. A third modification appears to involve nanotechnology to make the virus light enough to remain airborne for a long time, apparently giving it a range of up to 27 feet." (Mercola, April 26 2020)


There is a problem over RaTG13, the supposed bat virus. The RaTG13 element gives SARS-CoV-2 its massive ability to infect humans. In her Nature article of January 22 2020, Zheng-Li Shi et al. claimed that SARS-CoV-2 "is 96% identical at the whole-genome level to a bat coronavirus" called RaTG13 and they could find "no evidence for recombination events was detected in the genome of 2019-nCoV". The article stated that RaTG13 was discovered in Yunnan province, China, in 2013, but, according to Nerd Has Power, Shi allegedly admitted that she does not have a physical copy of this RaTG13 virus or any physical proof for the existence of the RaTG13 virus. She only has its sequence information, a string of letters with A, T, G, and C, which could have been typed by anyone and then uploaded onto the public virus database. Her Nature paper of 2013 listed two bat coronaviruses, Rs3367 and SHC014, not RaTG13. RaTG13 was first published on January 22 2020 by Shi, but apparently with no substantiated physical record of its existence. This evidence supports the supposition that SARS-CoV-2 was a human genetically engineered virus or bioweapon, not a zoonotic virus so far found in nature.


Zheng-Li Shi's publications showed that from 2010 she engineered a bat virus to infect humans, confirming that SARS was genetically modified to attack humans through ACE2 receptors. SARS is thus a bio-engineered warfare weapon which the University of North Carolina and an Australian laboratory "were trying to make even more dangerous with the gain-of-function and the HIV" (Boyle, April 26 2020).


Dr Shi, the director of the Centre for Emerging Infectious Diseases at the Chinese Academy of Sciences’ Wuhan Institute of Virology, spent time in Australia as a ­visiting scientist for three months from February 22 to May 21, 2006, where she worked at the CSIRO’s top-level Australian Animal Health Laboratory (Markson, May 4 2020). An archived and translated biography on the Wuhan Institute of Virology website states that she was working with the SARS virus. It states: “The SARS virus antibodies and genes were tested in the State Key Laboratory of Virology in Wuhan and the Animal Health Research Laboratory in Geelong, Australia.” Dr Shi’s protégé, Peng Zhou — now the head of the Bat Virus Infection and Immunity Project at the Wuhan Institute of Virology — spent three years at the bio-containment facility Australian Animal Health Laboratory between 2011 and 2014. He was sent by China to complete his doctorate at the CSIRO from 2009-2010. During this time, Dr Zhou arranged for wild-caught bats to be transported alive by air from Queensland to the lab in Victoria where they were euthanised for dissection and studied for deadly viruses. Dr Linfa Wang, while an Honorary Professor of the Wuhan Institute of Virology between 2005 and 2011, also worked in the CSIRO Office of the Chief Executive Science Leader in Virology between 2008 and 2011.


In 2015, according to Dr Peter R Breggin: "American researchers and Chinese Wuhan Institute of Virology researchers collaborated to transform an animal coronavirus into one that can attack humans. Scientists from prestigious American universities and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) worked directly with the two coauthor researchers from Wuhan Institute of Virology, Xing-Yi Ge and Zhengli-Li Shi. Funding was provided by the Chinese and US governments. The team succeeded in modifying a bat coronavirus to make it capable of infecting humans."


Zheng-Li Shi’s group was creating chimeric constructs as far back as 2007 and as recently as 2017, when they created a whole of 8 new chimeric coronaviruses with various RBMs. The Wuhan NIH grant of 2019 included: "Aim 3. In vitro and in vivo characterization of SARSr-CoV spillover risk, coupled with spatial and phylogenetic analyses to identify the regions and viruses of public health concern. We will use S protein sequence data, infectious clone technology, in vitro and in vivo infection experiments and analysis of receptor binding to test the hypothesis that % divergence thresholds in S protein sequences predict spillover potential."


Dr. Charles Lieber, chairman of the Harvard department of chemistry and a nanoscience expert, was allegedly paid $50,000 a month from 2012 to 2017 to help establish and oversee the  the Wuhan University of Technology-Harvard Joint Nano Key Laboratory. In fact before 2015 (Menachery VD ... Zhengli, et al., 2015) the University of North Carolina was investigating gain-of function with the full-length and chimeric SHC014 recombinant viruses, until it was paused and the restarted by the US National Institutes of Health (NIH). The University of North Carolina was doing a second gain-of-function research projects under Dr. [Yoshihiro] Kawaoka from the University of Wisconsin, who had allegedly resurrected the Spanish flu virus for the Pentagon. Although the NIH halted funding of this kind of gain-of-function research on lethal pathogens in 2014, it reauthorized it in December 2017.  It was also allegedly funded by the NIAID under Dr. Fauci. 


The University of North Carolina article allegedly said it was dealing with synthetic molecules. Synthetic molecules were specifically criminalized in the US Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989 drafted by Prof. Francis Boyle. The law provides for life imprisonment for "all the scientists involved at the University of North Carolina and everyone who funded this project, knowing that it was existentially dangerous — and that includes Fauci and [people at] the NIH … UNC, Food and Drug Administration … the Dana Harvard Cancer Institute at Harvard … the World Health Organization …”  The whole synthetic biology movement was allegedly set up and funded by the Pentagon's DARPA (Boyle, April 26 2020).


Professor Richard Ebright was reported as saying: “… bat coronaviruses at Wuhan [Center for Disease Control] and Wuhan Institute of Virology routinely were collected and studied at BSL-2 (Biosecurity Level 2), which provides only minimal protections against infection of lab workers. Virus collection, culture, isolation, or animal infection at BSL-2 with a virus having the transmission characteristics of the outbreak virus would pose substantial risk of infection of a lab worker, and from the lab worker, the public.”


Other reports allegedly state: "A safety breach at a Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention lab is believed to have caused four suspected SARS cases, including one death, in Beijing in 2004. A similar accident caused 65 lab workers of Lanzhou Veterinary Research Institute to be infected with brucellosis in December 2019 … In January 2020, a renowned Chinese scientist, Li Ning, was sentenced to 12 years in prison for selling experimental animals to local markets.”


The Chinese Communist Party has been accused of covering up the virus at first. Josephine Ma, news editor of the South China Morning Post said her government covered up more than 200 cases of coronavirus in 2019, delaying global warnings and allowing the spread of the virus to leak into other countries. The Chinese Communist Party was helped in its cover-up allegedly by Facebook which censored and removed an article by Steve Mosher in the New York Post on February 22 2020, which questioned the zoonotic theory. Facebook unblocked this article Facebook’s “fact checker,” Danielle E. Anderson, was revealed as previously a paid researcher at the Wuhan laboratory.


According to Robert F Kennedy Jr, US researchers were producing super viral forms at labs like Fort Detrick and Wuhan, which are not only vaccine labs but also military labs, so that they may be able to weaponize the viruses. "Those experiments were going on in the United States until 2014. They were Dr. Anthony Fauci's projects. President Obama ordered that to stop because they had a lot of lab escape problems in 2014 from three different labs. Instead of stopping as he was ordered, Fauci moved those operations to the Wuhan lab in China and continued to do those experiments right up until the time that the coronavirus [pandemic occurred]. In fact, [infectious disease expert] Ian Lipkin was doing those experiments over there when [COVID-19] exploded. When President Trump came in, Obama had an office in the White House for pandemic defense, for pandemic security. They were involved in funding [coronavirus research projects in Wuhan] through Fauci. President Trump ended all funding for that office September 20, 2019. So that was the last paycheck any of those scientists got. On September 30 [2019], a whole lot of scientists were laid off in Wuhan. October 1 is when the first case of [COVID-19 was reported]. So, it's suspicious because it looks like there's a possibility — and I'm speculating here; I want to make that clear — but there's a possibility that somebody who lost their job in that lab ... could have released the virus. Because, immediately, it created an instantaneous market for people with that particular skillset, which is to study how to make a coronavirus vaccine. So, you could go from unemployed to highly employed almost overnight if you released one of those microorganisms they were creating in that lab."


In early 2018  Jamison Fouss and Rick Switzer from the U.S. Beijing embassy visited the Wuhan Institute of Virology and warned Washington that there were serious safety violations in the lab’s handling of bat coronaviruses. The officials were concerned that inadequately trained staff and lax security procedures at the lab, jointly funded by the Chinese and U.S., posed a serious risk of unleashing a “new SARS-like pandemic.” In 2004 there were two serious accidents at the high-security Beijing Virology lab, infecting two researchers with the dangerous SARS virus.


Kennedy also allegedly stated that "Redfield, Birx & Fauci lead the White House #coronavirus task force. In 1992, two military investigators charged Redfield & Birx with engaging in ‘a systematic pattern of data manipulation, inappropriate statistical analyses & misleading data presentation in an apparent attempt to promote the usefulness of the GP160 AIDS vaccine.’"​

​

It has been claimed that US involvement in bioweapons is not new. The bioterrorists anthrax attacks post-9/11 2001 which were used to help justify the Iraq invasion were carried out not by Arab terrorists but allegedly "by a yet unidentified cabal who deployed weaponized spores from the U.S. military biowarfare lab at Fort Detrick, Maryland."


Claims for financial compensation running into billions and trillions of dollars have been made in the USA, India and elsewhere against the Chinese Communist Party which at first covered up the incidence of COVID19 in Wuhan and thus allowed its spread around the rest of China and the world. Some critics have also claimed that the World Health Organization should have been much more proactive in insisting that the CCP should cooperate in dealing with the outbreak in the crucial initial stages.



The WHO, Bill Gates, Totalitarian ID, Infertility Vaccinations, Population Reduction and Bioweapons

By summer 2020 11 different strains of SARS-CoV-2 had been identified.  The A2a genetic line in Europe and the B1 genetic line in North America are more contagious than the 0 strain originating in Wuhan. Therefore a multivalent vaccine can likely be effective on up to 4-5 strains at most and thus limited to 70-75% of the world population.


Vaccinations; Swine Flu Vaccination Brain Damage; Nanochips and Smart Dust
​● Some studies show that seasonal vaccination may confer protection against the immediate seasonal influenza strain, but may also weaken immunity against pandemic strains.
● If this is the case, it may relate to some of the variation between countries in the severity of COVID-19, where there is a higher uptake of seasonal influenza vaccination for the elderly aged 65+ in the US, UK, Italy, Spain and the Netherlands, than in Germany, Turkey, the Czech Republic, Slovenia and Lithunia, although this does not fit with numbers from South Korea, New Zealand and some other countries.
● This could also relate to a prevalence for severe cases among the elderly and, in some countries, health workers, where they are encouraged or required to have seasonal flu shots.
● The 2009 H1N1 Swine Flu Vaccine caused brain damage in children.


COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, preexisting infections, previous vaccinations and awakening of XMRV (gamma retroviruses)



A Few of Many Studies on the Genetic Origin of SARS-CoV-2:


RFR/EMF Immune Effects, a Few of the Relevant Studies:


Effects of Pollution other than RFR on Coronavirus Symptoms:


Prevalence and Numbers of Asymptomatic People with COVID19:

Many studies showed that some half of the people infected with COVID19 were asymptomatic.


Children:


Fatality and Mortality Rates:
Fatality rate for cases diagnosed. 
Mortality rate for populations, often per 1,000 per year.


Spread of COVID-19:


COVID-19 Less Common among Wearers of Eye Glasses


Comorbidities and Drug Associations


​Blood-Clotting, Thrombosis, Thromboxane, Blood Types, Blood Pressure

EMF exposure can lead to or exacerbate thrombotic tendencies.


Oxygen Deprivation, Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy (HBOT) and Unusual Symptoms

Although short-term EMF exposure can increase HSP70, long-term EMF exposure reduces HSP70 and thus increases the risk of hypoxia.


Diet, Insulin, Type 2 Diabetes and Obesity


MATH+ protocol

This protocol, involving corticosteroids, vitamin C and heparin, reportedly saves the lives of over 98% of people hospitalized with COVID-19. It is supported by the FLCCC Working Group and used in China, Italy, Japan and South Korea.



Possible Natural and Other Remediation,
   including:
   Vitamins C and D,
   hydroxychloroquine, Antibodies, Astaxanthin, humidity, Ozone treatment, UV Light 
   [not recommendations]

Some Vitamin D Papers (see also under General):

​General, including Hydroxychloroquine and hydrogen peroxide:


Other Research

​

​Virus Identification Challenge


Censorship of Science and Disinformation: